And speaking of Vermeer……
Defining Virtuality in 17th Century Dutch Art
A number of scholars of 17th century Dutch art have used the phrase “virtual reality” to describe the startling realism of many of the paintings of the period; the art seems to possess a kind of “reality effect” making it seem more than painted materials applied to a surface.[1] A painting like Van Hoogstraten’s Interior of 1662 encourages such comparisons: with the aid of computer magnification you can take a “virtual” walk around this spacious interior, loosing yourself in the strange angles and through-views as you navigate Dutch pictorial space. In her book, The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft, Anne Friedberg discusses the term “virtuality” and its development in the seventeenth-century:
“In seventeenth and eighteenth- century optics, “virtual” was used to describe an image that was seen by looking through a lens or that appeared in a mirror. The term “virtual” first appears in English in the writings of Sir David Brewster about the properties of refraction in his Treatise on Optics (1831). Best known for his 1816 invention of the kaleidoscope (an optical device that demonstrated the principles of reflective symmetry), Brewster described the differing properties of an image seen by the eye and an image seen through the mediation of a lens. A “real image” is formed by the convergence of rays of light and is visible to the eye, but will also appear on a surface that is placed in a plane with the image. A “virtual image”- perceived in the brain- is visible to the eye but will not appear on a surface placed in its plane. Hence a “virtual image” in Brewster’s optics is not recuperable to representation. This meaning of “virtual” suggests an intangible, uncapturable, ineffable appearance- more imago than pictura.”[2]
Following on from this, Friedman concludes that the virtual image “has no material existence (appears in the brain, or on the retina) and the virtual image that is formed in representation signifies a subtle shift in its materiality.”[3] It is interesting to think of the artist’s studio in relation to this distinction between imago and pictura, specifically Vermeer’s studio as it appears- or doesn’t!- within his masterpiece The Art of Painting. Other painters in Vermeer’s hometown- Delft- used scientific methods in the construction of compositions. Carel Fabritius who came to Delft from Rembrandt’s studio, in the 1650s, employed a lens in his view of Delft; Samuel van Hoogstraten is his wonderful perspective box in the London National Gallery (1655-60) devises a series of virtual worlds that are only visible through the peephole of the camera obscura.
The Virtual Studio and the Art of Painting.
In an essay on the “imagined studio” of Vermeer, H. Perry Chapman ponders whether we are actually looking at Vermeer himself or the idea of the painter in The Art of Painting (1665-7). In this celebrated work Vermeer shows an artist from the back which Chapman believes could indicate Vermeer’s wish to efface himself from the painting, to negate his persona and artistic identity.[4] As Chapman says, the anonymity of the painter makes him the ideal painter, not a specific one. Vermeer was known as “the Sphinx of Delft” since his biographers do not really reveal him, probably because there wasn’t much textual data on him. Attempts to give Vermeer and his studio an identity, like in the movie The Girl with the Pearl Earring, really are romanticizing an enigma. The film shows Vermeer in his studio, but he never shows himself, except maybe in the Procuress (1656) and there he is clothed in the kind of period garments that the painter wears in the Art of Painting, which doesn’t help to place him in a specific social situation. Even when the curtain to the painter’s refuge is drawn back in the Vienna painting, the artist’s rear view seems to act as a barrier to entry to the studio, an idea that crops up in many artists’ studios examined in this series. If we need proof that Vermeer’s strategy is completely different we need only compare the allegory with another complex meditation on self-representation. As shown a few weeks ago, another 17th century painter Johannes Gumpp turns his back on the viewer, but he shows his own features through a complex system of representation involving canvas and mirror, not self-effacement at all. Vermeer’s artist does no such thing and that rejection of the viewer could support Chapman’s theory that this figure is an idea of painting, not Vermeer himself, or even a physical artist in a studio.
Chapman’s reading is persuasive and might help to explain why Clio- the muse of history- is present instead of some allegorical figure representing Pittura or painting itself, as this work is supposed to demonstrate the art of painting. An example of this in 17th century Dutch art is a woman painted by another artist, Frans van Mieris the Elder, Pictura (1661) an un-idealized female dressed in eye-catching garments, holding a sculpture- a reference either to the paragone, or the triumph of painting over sculpture. Yet if the painter sitting in the Art of Painting is a masculine version of Pittura, and the female muse is History, where is the painter himself? Could it be that he is an invisible presence revealing the studio to the spectator, and that the seated artist is a simulacrum of the painter, a virtual Vermeer?[5] A similar idea appears in another famous representation of a 17th century studio: Velasquez’s Las Meninas. In that complex painting, a figure framed in a doorway suggests an echo of Velasquez, maybe another simulacrum. The figure is actually a Velasquez: Jose Nieto Velasquez, steward of the palace. “Velasquez 2” seems to be entering the studio and seeing what we can’t see- Las Meninas being painted.[6] See here for more discussion of this. It’s true that in the Art of Painting, we’re allowed to see into the studio but we don’t really see what is being painted since it’s partly occluded by another Vermeer, whom I’m tempted to call “Vermeer 2.” Instead, we see an imago, which means something that cannot be seen or measured, as opposed to the pictura, which is something that can be focused on walls and surfaces, and thus measured with an instrument like a camera obscura- see below. The pictura belongs more to the process of representing and picturing, while the imago suggests the mystery at the heart of the artist’s studio, which we are never allowed to penetrate.
Vermeer's Virtuality: Looking Through the Camera Obscura in the Seventeenth-Century.
In her ground breaking The Art of Describing, Svetlana Alpers cites Kenneth Clark’s comment about Vermeer’s The Art of Painting being the “nearest painting has ever come to a coloured photograph.”[7] Indeed, some modern artists have tried to capture the “look” of a Vermeer in photographs and coloured prints. The idea of Vermeer’s paintings resembling photographs goes back to the nineteenth-century when connoisseurs employed photographs, or reproductive media such as etchings, lithographs, when identifying and presenting a painter’s oeuvre. As Ivan Gaskell shows, photographic pioneers like Fox-Talbot turned to the conventions of Dutch art: his photograph Open Door seems to reference Vermeer’s The Little Street.[8] This interest in Vermeer’s photographic realism has centred on the device known as the camera obscura, although it is not known whether Vermeer used optics to help him create his pictures. His paintings with their sharp clarity suggest optical precision, although there is no documentation to back up these claims. Unperturbed by the lack of textual evidence, Philip Steadman, an architect and professor of Urban Studies, has written a book called Vermeer’s Camera.[9] Steadman has meticulously reconstructed Vermeer’s studio using models of the paintings to plot out the angles that Vermeer may have used to create his “virtual” worlds. The camera obscura (Latin dark chamber) is an optical device used, for example, in drawing or for entertainment. It is one of the inventions leading to photography. The principle can be demonstrated with a box with a hole in one side (the box may be room-sized, or hangar sized). Light from a scene passes through the hole and strikes a surface where it is reproduced, in colour, and upside-down. The image's perspective is accurate. The image can be projected onto paper, which when traced can produce a highly accurate representation. Using mirrors, as in the 18th century overhead version, it is possible to project a right-side-up image. Another more portable type is a box with an angled mirror projecting onto tracing paper placed on the glass top, the image upright as viewed from the back. As a pinhole is made smaller, the image gets sharper, but the projected image becomes dimmer. With too small a pinhole the sharpness again becomes worse due to diffraction. Some practical camera obscuras use a lens rather than a pinhole because it allows a larger aperture, giving a usable brightness while maintaining focus. In the movie The Girl with the Pearl Earring,[10] we see Vermeer allow the serving maid Griet to look inside the magic box where she thinks the artificial model that the painter uses is located. Here we have another reconstruction of Vermeer’s studio, but this time in the cinema. The interiors are cleverly devised, but again, we have no idea if the movie is recapturing the reality of seventeenth- century Delft, or whether it is simply another virtual Vermeer created by imagination and trickery. The coordinates of Vermeer’s studio remain uncertain and his art an eternal mystery.
[1] For example Mariet Westermann, The Art of the Dutch Republic 1585-1718, 1996, 71-98; H. Perry Chapman, “The Imagined Studios of Rembrandt and Vermeer” in Inventions of the Studio, Renaissance to Romanticism, ed. Michael Cole & Mary Prado, 2005, 108-146.
[2] Friedberg, The Virtual Window, 8-9.
[3] Friedberg, The Virtual Window, 9.
[4] Chapman, “The Imagined Studios of Rembrandt and Vermeer”, 137-8.
[5] Chapman, “The Imagined Studios of Rembrandt and Vermeer”, 142.
[6] Hubert Damisch, The Origin of Perspective, 1995, 436.
[7] Kenneth Clark, quoted in Alpers, The Art of Describing, 1984, 27.
[8] Ivan Gaskell, Vermeer’s Wager: Speculations on Art History, Theory and Art Museums, 2000, 142.
[9] http://www.vermeerscamera.co.uk/home.htm.
[10] The Girl with the Pearl Earring, 2003.
Superb post! Despite the increasing optical evidence suggesting the possible use of the camera lucida/obscura device to aid composition, it's unlikely to be embraced by traditional art historians until a smoking gun document is fished out from somewhere linking an artist directly to a device.
That many art historians cannot hope to make sense of the mathematics underlying optical studies of art seem to be a the greatest sticking point, hence the statement "no documentation exists".
The reproducible logical processes of focal phenomena are used in analyses of images used in photography by military and law enforcement on a daily basis - yet apply it to art and have it generate some numbers and you have people up in arms.
There are fascinating articles on this being done extending before Vermeer, going all the way back to van Eyck, although me must remember that the description of optical properties underlying such devices go as far back as Aristotle.
For those interested, Charles Falco's site hosted by the University of Arizona contains many interesting resources:
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/SSD/art-optics/index.html
David Stork's mathematical analysis of certain pieces are also worth exploring, in some instances providing a counterpoint analysis to some of Hockney-Falco's findings.
Better science is the way to refute claims, not intuitive statements which are little more than leaps of faith.
Lorne Campbell's lengthy rant about van Eyck not needing to use a mirror or lens in the 'Renaissance Faces' catalogue is perfect example of an traditional art historian using very little to refute claims about these techniques other than their gut feeling.
Nevertheless, an interesting topic, which wont be going away any time soon!
Kind Regards
H
Posted by: H Niyazi | 07/06/2011 at 10:20 AM
I saw 'David Hockney: Secret Knowledge' on BBC4 Omnibus a few years ago and it was a really engaging programme on the subject. Also saw Hockney's portraits done using a camera obscura at his portrait exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery in 2007 and really admired his devotion to understanding early artists and techniques.
So it's great to see the academic validation of his research in the Arizona University link in the comment above. I'm currently enjoying the Sunday at the Met YouTube videos http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=On+the+Use+of+Optical+Devices+by+Renaissance+Painters&aq=f whilst I 'work'
Posted by: Glennis McGregor | 07/06/2011 at 11:34 AM
Hi Glennis - my grasp of Hockney-Falco and Stork et al's work are more in congruence with my own scientific training.
There are very few art historians that will acquiesce to use of these techniques, despite the mathematics underlying them.
It is a source of constant puzzlement when scientific elements that are not understood are fobbed of for "lack of documentation" Some art historians are only starting to come around to accepting chemical analyses of pigments. eg. We can now describe Renaissance artists' color palettes in chemical terms - rather than rely on documentation of ancient pigment recipes to validate them.
This optical science stuff will take a little bit longer!
H Niyazi
3pipe.net
Posted by: H Niyazi | 07/06/2011 at 03:29 PM
i need some art books and letterin books for future perpose.send through 0265236049
Posted by: richard klu | 07/06/2011 at 09:39 PM
Been reading this blog for awhile but i have been lazy to drop a comment and say thanks. That ends these days: Thanks mate!
Posted by: speedsCaw | 05/27/2012 at 12:02 AM
http://jazzshow.biz - dermatend scab On one of the most popular sites, I found that you could purchase 1,000 Facebook likes for $70.00 or $175.00 for 2,500 Facebook likes. This particular site also offered a custom buy - $.07 per like when you ordered in quantities of 1,000 with a maximum of 5,000 likes purchased.
http://jazzshow.biz
Posted by: Nafhellagycle | 06/03/2012 at 11:22 PM
http://sikis18.org/ - zetaclear where to buy Nearly anything that allows people to communicate efficiently and proficiently is undoubtedly a beneficial issue. In FB chat, working with smileys emoticons appropriately enable bring about good conversation.
There can be no question that Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and any number of other social networking sites come with benefits. With countless users worldwide, and more joining daily, it's clear social media is a force to be reckoned with.
Posted by: Nafhellagycle | 06/04/2012 at 04:25 AM
class of drug azithromycin zithromax 4317 http://buyzithromaxan.com/#4084 staph infection zithromax online
Posted by: Calminettenot | 06/19/2012 at 08:02 PM
п»їwhere can i buy doxycycline online 9349 http://buy-doxycycline-hyc.com/#0933 doxycycline in pregnancy
Posted by: PireHouro | 06/24/2012 at 12:30 PM
doxycycline hyclate for sinus infection 7672 http://buy-doxycycline-hyc.com/#9134 uses of doxycycline
Posted by: GefBoonBOOT | 06/24/2012 at 05:14 PM
amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium for children http://amoxil-amoxicillin-pharm.com/#7912 mouth infection amoxicillin
Posted by: Jepdygieririt | 06/28/2012 at 06:07 AM
amoxicillin appetite http://amoxil-amoxicillin-pharm.com/#5054 amoxicillin instructions urinary tract infections
Posted by: DewepeLip | 06/28/2012 at 05:05 PM
cheap cialis tablets http://buy-cialis-best-price.com/#6980 ordering cialis overnight delivery
Posted by: INISTEFUENE | 06/29/2012 at 09:59 AM
6360 risiko viagra http://cialisviagrade.com/#5410 viagra schäden 1919 use for doxycycline http://bdoxycyclineh.com/#2678 doxycycline hyclate 100mg cap
Posted by: piedsdase | 07/22/2012 at 01:48 PM
qssxlbsujouifcmppe, Tramadol buy, dfirylA, [url=http://jonconnoronline.com/]Tramadol toothache[/url], akXLFQZ, http://jonconnoronline.com/ Tramadol order online, KqlqHnT, Buy hgh, DbTfWxd, [url=http://www.aegisbicycles.com/]Hormone hgh[/url], JNENzpP, http://www.aegisbicycles.com/ Hgh and motor skills, bFujrSN, I buy thyromine, IKSmQlE, [url=http://thyromine2k.com/]Thyromine in the[/url], csuEQGX, http://thyromine2k.com/ In thyromine, bgoSIwW, Juegos de casino, KrpHzDC, [url=http://homelinkegypt.com/]Casino en linea[/url], FvCCXyc, http://homelinkegypt.com/ Juegos gratis de casino tragamonedas, ktehNNI, Proactol site youtubecom, yMqvvKs, [url=http://proactol-information.com/]Proactol reviews[/url], GOFcfqG, http://proactol-information.com/ Proactol, BEjoxIm, Free online casino ipad, mFypsQf, [url=http://adoptees-contact-line.com/]Online iPad Casino[/url], FazpIdK, http://adoptees-contact-line.com/ iPad Casino, SFdHZXe.
Posted by: Cheap tramadol | 07/31/2012 at 08:40 PM
sxuvdbsujouifcmppe, Payday loan no check, dcKnHre, [url=http://criminologycourses.net/]Payday Loans[/url], dgMYppi, http://criminologycourses.net/ No fax payday loans advice, JzGxidU, Dapoxetine online, rFbvsik, [url=http://gslibya.com/]Dapoxetine pills[/url], ZLxEGcy, http://gslibya.com/ Dapoxetine, gulZxcm, Casino Online, sWtmeso, [url=http://pamelabhatia.com/]Casino online uk[/url], jOIPWhJ, http://pamelabhatia.com/ Buy casino online, sUuakOu, Forex book, Owtrhzb, [url=http://ourrepublicblog.com/]Learn forex trading[/url], eAOqfRK, http://ourrepublicblog.com/ Ultimate forex trading software, FGcQUgB, Bad credit payday loan lenders, SqqTiVY, [url=http://tron-movie.com/]Payday Loan[/url], ZRMLNBL, http://tron-movie.com/ Payday loan no direct deposit, fPljJik, Car Insurance, zHaHUcw, [url=http://carinsurance-information.co.uk/]Rental car insurance[/url], HvMsQwu, http://carinsurance-information.co.uk/ Progressive car insurance, HilqNNt.
Posted by: Real payday loan lenders | 07/31/2012 at 09:20 PM
ostozbsujouifcmppe, Auto insurance bloomington, qqmXNRy, [url=http://beckeh.com/]United auto insurance[/url], wOMXICw, http://beckeh.com/ Free auto insurance, sScJZJx.
Posted by: Teen auto insurance | 08/20/2012 at 08:16 AM
generic nexium availability http://nexiumgeneric.wetpaint.com/page/Buy+Nexium+40+mg#24086, nexium lek; | lipitor tablets http://www.jukeboxalive.com/blog.php?blog_id=14097107#6887, can lipitor be crushed; | cheapest flagyl http://www.jukeboxalive.com/blog.php?blog_id=14097421#38620,
Posted by: DkUnrermagf | 12/07/2012 at 10:45 AM
order cheap nexium http://www.jukeboxalive.com/blog.php?blog_id=14096553#28285, nexium plavix; | price for generic lipitor http://www.dailystrength.org/people/1962320/journal/5116875#49108, chemical name for lipitor; | flagyl pills http://www.dailystrength.org/people/1939776/journal/5116982#74269,
Posted by: EpUnrermaqx | 12/07/2012 at 12:03 PM
augmentin 250 mg http://groups.diigo.com/group/GertrudeJamisonSpenceFuller/content/buy-augmentin-no-prescription-7805201#4220, can you drink alcohol while taking augmentin; | bactrim buy online http://smithbjerrin512.dmusic.net/journal/1727681#57992, bactrim ds side effects; | celexa buy http://www.iamsport.org/pg/blog/meltonlott41/read/13283586/buy-celexa-10mg#29719,
Posted by: Xoattedsos | 12/07/2012 at 09:40 PM
tab augmentin 625mg http://merrilldonah92.xanga.com/770235917/buy-augmentin-500mg/#65644, antibiotic augmentin side effects; | bactrim 500 mg http://topamaxonline24.insanejournal.com/1234.html#37264, bactrim pharmacokinetics; | buy celexa canada http://celexanoprescription.wetpaint.com/page/Buy+Celexa+20+mg#14377,
Posted by: Tlattedsjn | 12/07/2012 at 10:57 PM
augmentin 625 mg tablets http://lioresalhelp7.insanejournal.com/1296.html#34427, augmentin bid; | buy bactrim ds no prescription http://www.supernova.com/smithbjerrin512/blog/1793810#75591, bactrim class; | buy generic celexa online http://www.dailystrength.org/people/1934412/journal/5119044#28385,
Posted by: Izattedsno | 12/08/2012 at 08:30 AM
purchase augmentin online http://buyaccutane247.over-blog.com/pages/buy-augmentin-500mg-8452492.html#96418, augmentin 875 mg bid; | bactrim 400 80 mg http://groups.diigo.com/group/IshamGavinBurtonTopp/content/buy-bactrim-generic-7806876#38069, bactrim ds 800 160 tab side effects; | buy celexa online cheap http://www.nexopia.com/users/guswentworth24/blog/5-buy-celexa-20-mg#12207,
Posted by: Zgattedshf | 12/08/2012 at 11:08 AM
tamoxifen 20 mg http://groups.diigo.com/group/KalvinLambertFerrellKruse/content/buy-tamoxifen-cheap-7817251#60931, losing weight while on tamoxifen; | proscar for sale http://hiltonsteven01.posterous.com/buy-proscar-5mg#87349, what is proscar 5 mg; | price of synthroid http://buysynthroid24975.webs.com/apps/blog/show/20800188-buy-synthroid-25-mcg#10761,
Posted by: HkOccursehp | 12/08/2012 at 08:02 PM
buy tamoxifen australia http://www.flixya.com/blog/5086858/Buy-Tamoxifen-20mg#77904, effect of tamoxifen on endometrium; | order proscar online http://buydiflucan24.posterous.com/buy-proscar-generic#16901, proscar prescribing information; | taking synthroid with other medications http://groups.diigo.com/group/MehmetBjornPotterCrews/content/buy-synthroid-25-mcg-7818524#27000,
Posted by: CcOccurselb | 12/08/2012 at 09:12 PM