Perhaps this belongs on the PCP site- news of the completion of the restoration of Poussin’s Crossing of the Red Sea, a painting in National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne.
This report from ABC news reproduces two photos of a section of the painting: one section before cleaning; another after restoration. You’ll see the back of the head of a young man, which according to the curators in this report was Poussin’s correction to a face he originally painted but didn’t like. They base this observation on the study of related visual sources such as engravings and replicas. In this interview the curators are talking about a “new look” to Poussin’s painting, which always rings alarm bells with me, not to mention raising the question of what the paintings looked like back in the 17th century- the of issue Poussin’s original intentions. To quote from ABC News:
Crossing section in its current state after restoration. | Crossing section before cleaning. |
Senior conservator Carl Villis says the "new look" of the painting actually brings the painting much closer to its original appearance.
For example the face of one of the figures in the painting was visible and now only the back of the head is seen.
"He [Poussin] did originally paint the face but decided he didn't like it and covered it up," Mr Villis said.
"The replica had the face turned round the other way as did an engraving and a tapestry that were also made.
"So we knew that this head was actually supposed to be turned round the other way."
Of course I knew about this restoration- but not the specifics of the cleaning, and certainly not this head alteration; but now the PCP has been launched, it seems appropriate to refer to this restoration again. As to Melbourne’s own “Poussin Project”, while I respectfully hear what the curators and restorers are saying about the head in engravings seemingly conveying Poussin’s original intention, that turned figure doesn’t gell with me. It’s not really a Poussin motif.
To be fair to the Australian curators, I’d have to study some sources in relation to the painting before judging their claims about Poussin’s original ideas for this figure, and one could start with a copy by Le Brun after Poussin’s original, from which many engravings derive. I won't say anything more about this case- maybe return to it on the PCP in the future. However, the issue of cleaning, restoration, and the original state of Poussin’s work will certainly figure in my first painting on the PCP, which is in a state of soon-come.
Here’s a reproduction of the whole painting pre-restoration. It’s not a very good one- but it gives you an idea of the composition and its figuration. I’ve had this in my files for ages, and in it you can see the figure in black looking out, at centre left. Of course this has been reversed and we now see the back of his head.
Nicolas Poussin, The Crossing of the Red Sea, National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, c 1634-5, National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, oil on canvas, 154 x 210 cm. |
As a fellow Poussinist I have enjoyed reading your blogs, and look forward to your 'Poussin Project' but I think, if we are to be at all critical of the conservation of the Crossing of the Red Sea by the NGV, the more important change to the paint surface of this very large canvas than the head reversal, is what appears to be the reconstruction of the pillar of cloud at the extreme right of the picture. Just before this picture was sent to the 1960 Paris exhibition, where it was reunited with it pendant in the National Gallery in London for the first and last time since they were split up for the first time in their history in 1945, the picture was cleaned (in Melbourne?), when it was discovered that the pillar of cloud (not fire, though it may be pinkish in tone, judging from the few glimpses in the online film clip of the newly unveiled restored picture) was so damaged that it was covered up - as Blunt noted in 1966. A study of the Gantrel engraving (on which engraver Wildenstein remarks that he worked after copies not originals, in this case apparently one by Le Brun) may show a face turned round, but there is no pillar of cloud - at least in his tiny reproduction; but the fact that the far more accomplished Baudet made the engraving of the pendant in London, not Gantrel, is interesting, and of course has had consequences for the dating of the work and may be evidence that Poussin did not work on them at exactly the same time - or it may not! In any case, it is greatly to be hoped that the NGV will publish a monograph on the newly restored picture (as, for example, Lyon did when it acquired the 1651 Flight into Egypt) so that the present more advanced technical restoration may be judged against that of 1960, and subsequent photographs until now. Ideally, we can only hope that the National Gallery in London (which cannot lend its picture due to the vandalism it suffer in the early 1980s) may request and be granted the chance to exhibit the pair together for the first time in over 50 years, so that contemporary scholars and the public unable to get to Melbourne may have a chance to study the two pendants. As with the London gallery's restoration of the Leonardo Madonna of the Rocks and the Louvre's cleaning of Leonardo's St Anne, the lengthy time taken by the NGV to clean this important and sadly little known Poussin (simply because of distance) speaks of far more careful conservation work undertaken than in 1960, and publication of the entire process is essential to assure scholars and the public that all changes made to the paint surface are informed and well-judged. It is unlikely that the NGV would not do so, and your blog is certainly right to ask the question.
Posted by: Stephen Conrad, Art Historian | 05/03/2012 at 11:36 PM
Hi David
I've been studying the new book on the Melbourne picture, but it is full of rather small illustrations, and frustratingly the one large photograph of the restored picture (across the book's gutter) does not show the pillar of red cloud/fire, as they have evidently cropped the photograph to avoid reproducing the overhanging rebates of the frame on p. 27, though this can be seen in the detail reproduced in the frame on p. 28 and on the front end flap. The Lebrun? copy on loan to Stanford University Museum is also reproduced, but again too small. Much of what we read here was stated in the NGV's online progress blog.
More interestingly perhaps, I have found a reference to the National Gallery's acquisition of the Golden Calf in Audrey Tyndall's little book 'Claude and the Poussins (Themes and Painters in the National Gallery Series 2 Number 4)' published in 1976, where we learn, on p.6, that 'This picture was separated from its pendant, for the first time, in 1945, when the Gallery was unable to purchase, also, The Crossing of the Red Sea which is now in Melbourne.'
Posted by: Stephen Conrad | 06/06/2012 at 09:27 AM
I am not that knowledgeable about the story until I read the post. Thank you for this. Though there are many issues raised here, I do have now a clearer insight of the story.
Posted by: Edward Robinson | 09/29/2012 at 12:53 AM
an avid painter here ..this is a very informative post, i was actually planning to go to Melbourne and see Nicolas Poussin's works in person.
Posted by: coffin world | 11/08/2012 at 08:22 PM
Special palladium golden louis vuitton bags canada head design, curved buttons and zippers, to further strengthen the metal texture . Kelsey series of bags have also been pro-gaze of many European and American stars . Valentine's Day Collection selection of leather material from the best origin, Gucci craftsmanship louis vuitton canada online and tradition for nearly a century, the complex process by experienced craftsmen hand-finished . Warm care Shiatzy Chen Mother's Day Special
Cater to the season is inspired by the Chinese folk art paper cutting, Shiatzy Chen launched a "continuous" series . General louis vuitton canada outlet
Manager Mr . Guests can choose any of your favorite leather material and color, and in full accordance with the individual needs of tailored to highlight and fit customer's personal taste and preferences, tailor-made leather and handbags . Pearl leather models with heart-shaped Gucci logo inlaid bow, very creative, chic and elegant . For to celebrate Dior Shangjia center boutiques grand opening of the Dior limited edition products:
For to celebrate Dior Shangjia center boutiques grand opening, this wool silk pleated dress will launch a special bright red limited edition . For decades, LOEWE has heritage and development of the Spanish Baroque style, brand perfect scarf to express the eternal emotion show must ripples.Dior VIII Grand Bal series watch the perfect combination of exquisite technology and excellent design, both watchmaking crystal, but also dotted Haowan decoration . The conference presented the main features of the bag, a hollow flower-themed show last fall pattern . And Karol FRANGE series of daily commuting or weekend is undoubtedly the choice of urban charm of women's self-confidence . On Friday, Jessica once again carrying her beloved Simple louis vuitton purses canada Bag go to work . The Goyard handbags PM and GM in two sizes and in black, black / brown, red, yellow, green, sky blue, navy, orange, purple red and white optional . The fashion industry, braccialini, is a legend, humor Trolltech breakthrough design and imagination, Smart real shape of the free flow of stunning and vivid, the natural world can be louis vuitton canada called a handbag shape, quaint yet elegant . With the introduction of the world's first to be identified to use the the Amazon jungle zero destruction "leather handbags series, this origin of the brand in Florence, Italy to continue to practice its commitment to eco-conscious commitment . The brand has been cruising in the process of exciting discoveries and experiments, while faithful to its inherent innovation and stringent standards and good integration with our modern lifestyle . On Friday, Jessica once again carrying her beloved Simple Bag go to work.
Posted by: Robyzh90 | 05/15/2013 at 09:01 PM
Online shopping to keep their eyes open, buy a reasonable price, quality and reliable products to every buyer must pay attention to, may you still have more experience in this area, not anti-sharing at the message below, easy to look at more users . But avoid mothballs or other taste of things together . This trend of U . So like shoes, several interactive use bag gets wet, you can with a dry towel dry water, which then plug some newspapers, magazines and the like dried Do not kick directly in the sun louis vuitton outlet drying . Generally bags from women who like to change bags often . The bag corner spalling, or frayed, the marker painted louis vuitton bags uk with the same color with the bag will not be too conspicuous . If used in the rain.
Posted by: Robojl02 | 06/20/2013 at 06:28 AM